Oil Price on Monday: will it reflect the steadily rising tension in the Middle East?

 

Sentiments in the oil markets

Analysts are keen on watching the developments in the crude oil markets on Monday, having witnessed a tumultuous week, where the investor sentiment oscillated between two forms of unpredictability that corresponded with a sharp fall in price, followed by a fragile recovery.

On Tuesday, the API, American Petroleum Institute, predicted yet another US crude inventory draw, but by a modest amount – 869000 million barrels. On Wednesday, however, the EIA, Energy Information Administration, released its own figures that showed a crude inventory build-up of 3.6 million barrels.

Not only did the last figure unsettle the markets, but also made the positive sentiments that had been hanging over the markets for months, reflected strongly by the upward trend of the oil price, just vanish in a matter of hours.

When I subjected three articles from sites today, directly linked to crude oil markets, to a Machine Learning algorithm that measures the sentiment, what you see on the top of the article was produced; the sentiment seems to be pretty negative; however, it was not all doom and gloom. 

The reaction by the markets last week was quite unexpected, because by then a pair of potentially serious crises was developing around a crucial shipping lane for the crude oil markets: the attack on an Israeli-registered tanker followed by the piracy event on board on another tanker in the Gulf of Oman, blamed both on Iran.

Since the twin development could easily disrupt the supply of crude oil, as the passage is known for the movement of the 5th of the world’s crude oil needs, analysts expected a rise in price – for obvious reasons. The reaction of the investors, however, was the polar opposite – and the price of crude oil dropped, indeed.

Against this backdrop, the analysts were then keen on listening to the first major policy speech by Ebrahim Raisi, the new Iranian president on Thursday. Much to their surprise, he was fairly conciliatory in his tone to the rest of world in general, and to Iran’s Middle East neighbours in particular.

Although some officials, representing the West attended inauguration in Tehran, the Western tone again changed by the weekend in light of a report by a US security agency, pointing the finger at Iran for both maritime incidents.

Of course, Iran denied the responsibility for the attack; Neither the West nor Israel, however, was prepared to accept the Iranian narrative.

In another development, a short-lived firefight erupted between Hezbollah of Lebanon and the IDF, Israel Defence Forces, breaking a lull of over a decade; both sides, however, said they did not want it to escalate further; at the weekend, however, their respective appear to have changed again for some reason.  

President Raisi, meanwhile, told the visiting Hezbollah deputy leader that his organization was deterrence against Israel just after the inauguration of the former, something that seems to be open to interpretation in the coming weeks.

Iranian generals, meanwhile, are threatening to retaliate in kind against what they collectively call, a ‘misadventure by Israel or the West’.

The cumulative effect of the sentiments compels analysts to anticipate some form of military development in the region as something inevitable in the current circumstances. The price movements of both WTI and Brent crude next week will indicate something in response to what prevails in the markets at present.

 

 

 

 

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Oil price closer to $70 a barrel: it's more realistic, sustainable and better than pursuing unrealistic goals

Oil Price and Lingering Suez Factor

What caused the downward trend in crude oil price?

Crude Oil: latest news